Chippenham campaigners celebrate partial victory in Birds Marsh battle

The Friends of Birds Marsh will now fight to protect another two fields

The Friends of Birds Marsh will now fight to protect another two fields

First published in News
Last updated
by , Senior reporter

Birds Marsh in north Chippenham has finally been legally protected from development after nearly five years of campaigning.

The woodland has been granted Village Green status, which makes it a criminal offence to build there. This was applied for last June by the Friends of Birds Marsh and a field below, running next to Hill Corner Road, will also be protected.

But the campaigners have not finished fighting yet. They are mounting a legal challenge to protect another two fields, one in between the two areas and another at the bottom corner of the wood running parallel to Malmesbury Road.

This could block plans for a northern link road, connecting the Malmesbury Road roundabout of the A350 with the B4069 opposite the Parsonage Way junction. The road is part of an outline planning application for 750 houses south of Birds Marsh, which was made in February 2012 by the North Chippenham Consortium, made up of Barratt Homes, Persimmon Homes and Heron Land.

The plans have attracted 103 responses from the public in opposition and three in favour.

Friends of Birds Marsh chairman Pete Humphrey said: “We are delighted to have won this hard-fought battle; it will hopefully safeguard the area for future generations. However, the fight still goes on.

“Even with that field denied to them the developers will still go ahead. If we manage to get the middle field, it makes it more difficult to deliver the road and turn a profit. And if we get the top field it will block a northern ring road.

“Some of the hedgerows and trees are 500 years old and some of the planned road is just 60 metres from the woods. You can’t build around those roots, you’ll damage them.”

The draft Wiltshire Core Strategy establishes that 4,000 homes need to be built in Chippenham between 2006 and 2026, 750 of which should be in the north.

Mr Humphrey said he was not reassured by a buffer zone around Birds Marsh that was mentioned in the document.

He said: “The economic downturn will pass. What won’t change is if they’re allowed to build on the green fields around Chippenham, we won’t get them back. That’s it, they’re gone.”

But Melody Thompson, town councillor for Hardenhuish, said although she was not in favour of the development, the northern link road would be needed.

She said: “If the housing development is forced on us through the core strategy, then we’ve got to have the road to go with it. It will alleviate traffic on Hill Corner Road, which is already used as a rat run.”

The target date for a decision on the North Chippenham Consortium development is June 28. It is unlikely to be considered until after a hearing into the draft Wiltshire core strategy, which for Chippenham takes place on June 25 and 26.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:17am Thu 20 Jun 13

HughBriss says...

Well done, them!
Well done, them! HughBriss
  • Score: 0

12:43pm Fri 21 Jun 13

wiltshireborne says...

Now that it's been "saved" from the developers, who's going to maintain Birds Marsh? I use it quite often as a running route and it's become almost impenetrable in places with large bogs, fallen trees and thick rhododendron clogging most of the foot paths.
The woods could be a really nice place for many people to access and enjoy and the developers could have very easily been required to maintain the woods as part of the development agreement.
I don't mind helping to restore access and improve the area but I don't see anyone else using Birds Marsh. All the dog walkers use the fields around it.
Now that it's been "saved" from the developers, who's going to maintain Birds Marsh? I use it quite often as a running route and it's become almost impenetrable in places with large bogs, fallen trees and thick rhododendron clogging most of the foot paths. The woods could be a really nice place for many people to access and enjoy and the developers could have very easily been required to maintain the woods as part of the development agreement. I don't mind helping to restore access and improve the area but I don't see anyone else using Birds Marsh. All the dog walkers use the fields around it. wiltshireborne
  • Score: 1

4:00pm Tue 25 Jun 13

HughBriss says...

wiltshireborne asks..."who's going to maintain Birds Marsh?" and makes some suggestions which I agree with. It would be nice to see the wood in the state it was, say, 50 years ago when it was still maintained by its owners whose ancestors planted the wood. It wasn't then, and is not now, "as nature intended".
The reason for the current boggy state is largely down to blocking the streams which used to drain it.
wiltshireborne asks..."who's going to maintain Birds Marsh?" and makes some suggestions which I agree with. It would be nice to see the wood in the state it was, say, 50 years ago when it was still maintained by its owners whose ancestors planted the wood. It wasn't then, and is not now, "as nature intended". The reason for the current boggy state is largely down to blocking the streams which used to drain it. HughBriss
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree