THE SAM MORSHEAD COLUMN

Sam Morshead Sam Morshead

IT’S amazing how quickly the outside world’s view of Swindon Town as a footballing entitiy is changing.
 

Not so long ago, little old Swindon could barely attract half-a-second in the national spotlight and, when it did, it was mainly thanks to a very real sense of impending doom.
 

There was nothing for anyone who didn’t have an intimate association with the club to grab hold of.
 

There was no charismatic manager, no free-flowing football, no post-match rants about Chihuahuas or Scottish midfielders celebrating in their pants.
 

There were no PFA award winners, no trips to Italy, no claims of racial harrasment or 21-minute substitutions.
 

There were no wild analogies, no double training sessions, no public fall-outs or year-long unbeaten home runs.
 

And in the space of 15 months, that has all changed.
 

And because of that, and because of the investment and ambition at the heart of the club, Swindon Town is viewed very differently.
 

Just this week, we got an example of that following a tribunal panel’s decision that James Collins was worth £140,000 up front.
 

Collins’ former club Shrewsbury, understandably seeing as their valuation was considerably (and I mean really quite considerably) more than £140,000, were less than impressed.
 

That in itself is hardly shocking, but there was a sentence in the statement that they released after the tribunal fee was announced that was particularly poignant.
 

It read: “The level of compensation awarded for such a highly valued player undermines the position of a club which operates within a prudent financial budget and instead rewards clubs who approach players with highly attractive contracts that can be afforded as they are not having to pay an appropriate fee to the parent club.”
 

“Wow,” I thought. “Are we really now a lower-league bully?”
 

It was the second time in a week that it had been suggested that little old Swindon have become a tiny bit big time after Carlisle manager Greg Abbott mentioned post-match at Brunton Park last Saturday that Gary Roberts took a “ridiculous” sum of money to sign on at the County Ground.
 

If there was love for Swindon Town from those following our plight in the recent past, there will most certainly be jealous resentment in the present.
Opposition fans love to hate Paolo Di Canio, opposition managers envy his budget and strength in depth.
 

It wouldn’t be fair to brand Town as the underdog in a match against any team in League One.
 

Di Canio said in the week that he’d rather have more friends in the game than money in the bank.
 

I’m pretty sure I represent the majority when I say I’d happily sacrifice a few friends to get back into the Championship.
 

While being popular is always a bonus, it’s the results you get that really matter.
 

l I ARRIVED at work on Monday to be greeted by a colleague with the biggest smile across his face.
 

Apparently I was the first reporter in his 10 years with the paper to miss kick-off at a Swindon match after all my travel troubles last weekend.
That’s one accolade I didn’t ever plan on ending up with.

lIt was great to see Swindon Town’s powers-that-be make a gesture of goodwill to those fans who missed much of the game at Brunton Park last week.
 

You have to be rich, mad or incredibly devoted to travel all that way and it was right that supporters were offered some form of compensation.
 

However, seeing as the Robins’ hierarchy did their best to delay kick-off without success it was an impressive and all too rare reocgintion of the fans.
Frequently sport seems to forget that it is an entertainment industry.
 

While supporters could never expect, and probably would never expect a game to be held back an hour or more to allow those stuck on a motorway to see the start, clubs have to remember that they are serving consumers.
Swindon did that and for that they have to be applauded.

lTHE World T20 kicked off in Sri Lanka this week, and yet all people can still find time to talk about is Kevin Pietersen.
 

Honestly, you would think the man was a demi-god with the amount of coverage he’s getting despite being an out-of-form county cricketer.
 

Oops, even I’m doing it now!
 

Nevertheless, the point stands.
 

We’ve got a cracking bunch of young international cricketers coming through the ranks right now - Joe Root, Nick Compton, James Taylor, Danny Briggs, Jonny Bairstow - these guys are the future.
 

KP provided eight years of flamingo-legged, skunk-haired, switch-hitting brilliance but it’s time to let go.

lSO it looks like rugby in this country has got itself into a spot of bother.
 

Rule number one in business, you can’t sell something twice to two different people and expect to get away with it!
 

Yet Premier Rugby managed to secure an astonishing £152million package with BT Vision, who are very keen to broadcast the Heineken Cup, in the same week BSkyB extended their contract to show Europe’s showpiece competition.
 

To be fair, rugby union has only been professional since 1995 and teenagers are renowned for not being great with money.

Comments(17)

London Red says...
8:15am Sat 22 Sep 12

Can't believe even Sam has bought into this L1 bullies ****!
.
Can we pay more than Shrewsbury? Yes we can!
.
Is this a new phenomenon? NO!!!! It certainly did not start 15 months ago - but about 60 months ago when a certain Mr Fitton and Co rolled into town
.
Do people think that Douglas, Prutton, Lucas and Greer were here on work experience?
.
There is a reason why we can pay more and it is not just Sir Martyn Arbib and Andrew Blacks money
.
We get thousands more through the gate and hundreds of thousands more through Sponsorship - are Shrewsbury sponsored by Samsung, Adidas, EA Sports and 442? No - and that's not new these were here pre PdC!!!!!
.
Did Shrewdbury get The People sponsoring them with 5 figures just for the FA Cup? No
.
Yes our board are taking an extra hit each year to compete with the likes of Norwich, Leeds, Millwall, Southampton, Peterborough, Charlton, Sheff U and MK Dons
.
But so what? It's there money!!!!
.
We are not Man City or Chelsea or even a Malaga - the board are still very conscience and stick to a budget - remeber we made a profit 2 years ago!
.
Its just they budget for a loss knowing you can't go up with out one (or rarely can)
.
As Wray said a loss is not bad - an unexpected loss is!
.
Especially as going up will recoup those losses in one year just in TV revenue alone!
.
He did get one thing right - we will soon forget about these b1tchy comments when we are watching Blackburn, Bolton, Blackpool, Birmingham, Boro, Palace, Derby Forest, Wolves and Sh1tty each week

old town robin says...
8:22am Sat 22 Sep 12

Sam, we all know of your love for cricket and rugby. But its Swindon news we're more interested in, when are you gooing to give some recognition to tAlan Rossiter and the Robins speedway team. They've had a great season, in the semi's against Birmingham, in with a chance to get to the finals of the Elite league, that means they are up there with the very best. in GB, yet never get a mention on here.

I know from buying the Adver on occassions the speedway does get good coverage, but we never seem to read anything about them mentioned by your good self, Yet Collongbourne Ducis cricket team does. Doh!

As a sports writer I would have thought you would cover everything Swindon, obviously football is first, but it's also good to know how the Robins or the Wildcats ice hockey are faring etc. After all they are representing the town at a national level of sport.

Hope you don't take this as a critiscm, but if we want to know how England are doing in the T20 or the money being put into Rugby, I think Sky sports or the nationals will give them all the coverage they need. Any acheivements or upcoming events for Swindon sports should be the main topics. Just a thought.

old town robin says...
8:24am Sat 22 Sep 12

London Red wrote:
Can't believe even Sam has bought into this L1 bullies ****!
.
Can we pay more than Shrewsbury? Yes we can!
.
Is this a new phenomenon? NO!!!! It certainly did not start 15 months ago - but about 60 months ago when a certain Mr Fitton and Co rolled into town
.
Do people think that Douglas, Prutton, Lucas and Greer were here on work experience?
.
There is a reason why we can pay more and it is not just Sir Martyn Arbib and Andrew Blacks money
.
We get thousands more through the gate and hundreds of thousands more through Sponsorship - are Shrewsbury sponsored by Samsung, Adidas, EA Sports and 442? No - and that's not new these were here pre PdC!!!!!
.
Did Shrewdbury get The People sponsoring them with 5 figures just for the FA Cup? No
.
Yes our board are taking an extra hit each year to compete with the likes of Norwich, Leeds, Millwall, Southampton, Peterborough, Charlton, Sheff U and MK Dons
.
But so what? It's there money!!!!
.
We are not Man City or Chelsea or even a Malaga - the board are still very conscience and stick to a budget - remeber we made a profit 2 years ago!
.
Its just they budget for a loss knowing you can't go up with out one (or rarely can)
.
As Wray said a loss is not bad - an unexpected loss is!
.
Especially as going up will recoup those losses in one year just in TV revenue alone!
.
He did get one thing right - we will soon forget about these b1tchy comments when we are watching Blackburn, Bolton, Blackpool, Birmingham, Boro, Palace, Derby Forest, Wolves and Sh1tty each week
Well said LR

SAPFanSTFC says...
8:26am Sat 22 Sep 12

Tut tut LR!!
...
It's "their" money not 'there' money! :-)
===
Good post with some very good points.

Davethered says...
8:46am Sat 22 Sep 12

Personally I don't give a **** about the rugby,ice hockey, cricket or speedway, all I want to read about is the football.I know people do like these other sports but let's keep them on another site

Davethered says...
8:47am Sat 22 Sep 12

Why the stars I never swore

Wilesy says...
8:57am Sat 22 Sep 12

Enjoyed the article Sam, up to the word applauded.

London Red says...
9:16am Sat 22 Sep 12

Very true SAP
.
Oh one other thing I forgot - the wage cap!!!!
.
That prevents any club spending above a certain percentage of income - so it must mean our income is massive compared to Shrewsbury etc
.
Anyway we are not top of the wage bill list- even with Shef U slashing their budget "they will pay more in tax than we do in wages"
.
Kitson hasn't gone there for £1k a week! Remember they were paying Evans £20k a week last season!!!
.
Our top wage is rumoured to be the £5k mark - so Evans tax bill was over that a week!
.
Do we complain? - No we don't we just get on with things
.
Anyway at least Bornmuff can't complain and we can focus on the football being played

London Red says...
9:19am Sat 22 Sep 12

Just thought the reason why this is only just hitting the headlines - most of the list above are now Championship
.
So we have risen up the wage league naturally rather than through an injection
.
Guess Carlilse lost out to Huddersfield, Leeds, Norwich and Millwall before but now it's just us!

Oi Den! says...
9:29am Sat 22 Sep 12

Bl00dy hell, LR. Your defensiveness seems to be bordering on obsession. Morshead writes an entertaining and factual piece and you attack him for "buying into League 1 bullies" stuff. He's not doing that at all. He is doing what a good journalist should do. He is looking at it from all angles. You would do well to do the same. Why not face the facts:
.
1. We are a rich club and very pleased about it.
.
2. Most other clubs at our level will find it hard to compete with us.
.
3. Those other clubs and their fans will be envious.
.
4. We would feel exactly the same if the roles were reversed.

Custodian says...
10:00am Sat 22 Sep 12

Stick to football.

Rebel_phish says...
10:02am Sat 22 Sep 12

Davethered wrote:
Why the stars I never swore
Dave,

Its not you, its the auto delete programe the Adver and other sites use.

If you type in an ofensive word, it will be removed, as you would expect.

If you type in a word that you may not consider ofensive, but others might, it will be removed. That is why you see posters mis-spelling words to get their point across.

Words like: rats-ars4, cr4p, sh11te, t!t, bl00dy h3ll, and many others to give examples.

Hope that helps.

London Red says...
10:08am Sat 22 Sep 12

1 - he states it started 15 month ago - That is wrong! so is NOT factual!
.
I'm not being defensive of our budget per se
.
I'm just sick to death of people finding a simple thing that our budget is the same as it was 2, 3, 4 or even 5 years ago so hard to grasp!
.
PdC is NOT getting anything more than Wilson ever did - so can peole like our own reporters stop suggesting he is!!!
.
2 - what is this sh1te about roles reversed???? We are not top of the food chain for f**k sake!
.
We are still outmuscled by be likes of Sheff U and Preston - remember they blew us out the water for Holmes
.
We have always had bigger teams than us in L1 and I have never once heard us complain about their budget in relation to ours
.
That's life - Birmingham blow Barnsley out the water, Manchester blow Reading out the water Rotherham blow AFC out the water!
.
You simply get on with it and work hard to achieve success with what you've got - like Holdsworth did when asked - he deflected away from it and gave PdC credit for the other elements of management
.
Next year hopefully we will be a small fish and I for one won't be complaining its not fair that the big boys are spending more on one player than we do on the squad - I will simply be glad we are there!
.
Maybe the smaller teams in this league should do the same!!!!

Oi Den! says...
10:43am Sat 22 Sep 12

LR, you can call it sh!te if you like, but I think it's as plain as a pikestaff that we have a significant advantage over most of our rivals (I'm not saying we are the strongest at our level - just one of the strongest). I'm not complaining about it either. It's what we have been crying out for, after years of being one of football's poor relations. It's just that I don't think we should pretend we are not in an enviable position.
.
Nobody (including you LR) knows the full details of the salary, inducements, bonuses etc we offer to players. That's why attempting a detailed analysis of it all gets us nowhere. However, I do think we know enough to have a safe bet that we are near the top of the tree. I have no doubt that, as well as being attracted by the money, many players are thrilled by the prospect of working with PDC. That, in itself, is an indirect consequence of the club's wealth and potential. PDC would not be with us if it were not for those factors.
.
So, all in all, I say we should grateful for what we have, not deny that we have it, and spare a few thoughts for fans of clubs that can only dream of being in our position.

London Red says...
1:33pm Sat 22 Sep 12

I not saying we are not right up there - but we are in a group of 6 or 7 not 1
.
Sheff U, Preston, Bournemouth, MK and probably Notts Co and Coventry despite their woes will be up there with us
.
So are we to expect Abbott and Co to make the same comments when they come to town?
.
Some how I doubt it!
.
You can deny it if you like but the world is looking at us as they want PdC to fail big time!
.
You can tell by the comments when he arrived and the delight of the media when situations like Clarke and Wes occur
.
However - what they got was a manager who got to a cup final, knocked a host of big clubs out in other cups, won the title in style and won manager of the year and a win ratio Ferguson and Mourinhio would be delighted with
.
So instead they try to belittle that and focus purely on the money - Steve Claridge did it every single FL show episode last year!
.
Why though?he's not alone - so why not the same comments and jabs at the others?
.
I can't remember when Poyet did an agrest job taking Brighton up similar comments about his budget and transfer fees

red dragon says...
2:52pm Sat 22 Sep 12

LR and oi Den, why the bickering, you are both very consistent contributors to this forum and obviously top supporters to the club not just PDC or any board member, past or present. Leave the handbags on the floor by your feet and enjoy what is happening. I can see both arguments but do not think analyzing everything is helping anyone.

Oi Den! says...
9:00am Sun 23 Sep 12

red dragon wrote:
LR and oi Den, why the bickering, you are both very consistent contributors to this forum and obviously top supporters to the club not just PDC or any board member, past or present. Leave the handbags on the floor by your feet and enjoy what is happening. I can see both arguments but do not think analyzing everything is helping anyone.
I see it as debating rather than bickering. Anyway you seem to agree with the point I am trying to make - that overanalysis gets us nowhere.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree