Hall added to holding company board (From The Wiltshire Gazette and Herald)

louiscassius wrote:
He we go, i'll copy some down:


CEO

City Project ltd



January 2009 – Present (4 years 3 months)

Global carbon offsets




Owner

Hotelier (Majorca)



April 2006 – January 2009 (2 years 10 months)

managing director




Fashion Trade

Fashion Industry



1979 – 1995 (16 years)

Head of sales

louiscassius wrote:
Hey also found this about his company he works for:

City House Projects Ltd

For larger developments we have established City House Projects Ltd (CHPL) to provide all the services and commercial expertise necessary to deliver Rational House™projects.

Unlike other multidisciplinary teams, City House Projects Ltd is contracturally linked to the specialist supply chain. This means that CHPL is uniquely positioned to deliver the Rational House™ product.

The City House Projects Ltd partners, Davis Langdon an AECOM company and AECOM are leaders in their respective fields of Project and Cost Management, Engineering and Design.

Strategic design and planning is led by Architect Robert Dalziel Rational House™. He is supported through framework agreements with the CHPL partners who have jointly invested time in developing the product and its supply chain. Each company is also represented on the Board of CHPL through non-exec director roles with the directors representing Rational House

Click on the company logos below to see how they fit into the City House Projects Ltd team.

Could be interesting....

madterrier wrote:
Strange. According to Dellam Corporate information, Hall holds only one directorship - Seebeck 87.

By contrast, McCrory holds 23 directorships, Hooper five and Murrall four.

Seebeck 87 was formed with just £1 of share capital - the absolute minimum for a limited company, and probably not even enough for all the directors to own even one share each unless the shares are valued at 5 pence each or something.

The company doesn't have to file accounts until September 2014, probably because as it was formed in December 2012 they chose a September year-end date so that by September 2013 that would only have traded for nine months, hence postponing the date by when they have to file annual accounts until 21 months from formation, so don't expect any insights soon.

All of these 'directors' are apparently paying themselves a salary from Swindon. If the overall budget is "the same" as with Black/Di Canio, yet there is no money for anything, then you wonder how much they are paying themselves.

I hope I am wrong, and I hope all comes good, with backers rather than bloodletters, but until more information is revealed by the new owners it's easy to see why so many people are sceptical. Very sceptical.

The new owners' communication is very poor, but that's probably because they don't want to tell us.

I would like to see the Football League be more open with supporters - perhaps through each club's Trust - as to what the due diligence process revealed when a takeover happens, what the strategy is that they approved, as well as why embargoes are put in place. Because otherwise as fans we are helpless to watch on, unsure whether our club is being milked dry, or managed by people with good intentions but no experience.

It's OK the Football League wanting to bring in more financial fair play regulation, but I think they also have a moral obligation to football fans generally to share with us what is happening.

Stilloyal wrote:
My team for tonight .

Fodders,
J.Mac, Wardy, Devera, Thommo,
William r/ m Macca holding, Ferry Robbo l/m

Collo or A.Rooney and Raffa striking.


Lets get this team balanced again.

Graham8181 wrote:

Stilloyal wrote:
My team for tonight .

Fodders,
J.Mac, Wardy, Devera, Thommo,
William r/ m Macca holding, Ferry Robbo l/m

Collo or A.Rooney and Raffa striking.


Lets get this team balanced again.

Thompson isn't playing tonight called up for Wales, just what we needed

Graham8181 wrote:

Stilloyal wrote: My team for tonight . Fodders, J.Mac, Wardy, Devera, Thommo, William r/ m Macca holding, Ferry Robbo l/m Collo or A.Rooney and Raffa striking. Lets get this team balanced again.

Thompson isn't playing tonight called up for Wales, just what we needed

Stilloyal wrote:

Graham8181 wrote:

Stilloyal wrote: My team for tonight . Fodders, J.Mac, Wardy, Devera, Thommo, William r/ m Macca holding, Ferry Robbo l/m Collo or A.Rooney and Raffa striking. Lets get this team balanced again.

Thompson isn't playing tonight called up for Wales, just what we needed

I thought that was L.Thompson, apologies. Then we need Macca r/b and keep Miller in holding

ghanimah wrote:
Hall is also a Director of Carvier Limited. Readers on here may want to Google that...it doesn't make for happy reading

Rogersforengland wrote:
Isn't where they filmed Benidorm....lol This guy will have no more money than the other we know about, it's the 2 still unknown dudes that hold the purse strings IMO

madterrier wrote:
Strange. According to Dellam Corporate information, Hall holds only one directorship - Seebeck 87.

By contrast, McCrory holds 23 directorships, Hooper five and Murrall four.

Seebeck 87 was formed with just £1 of share capital - the absolute minimum for a limited company, and probably not even enough for all the directors to own even one share each unless the shares are valued at 5 pence each or something.

The company doesn't have to file accounts until September 2014, probably because as it was formed in December 2012 they chose a September year-end date so that by September 2013 that would only have traded for nine months, hence postponing the date by when they have to file annual accounts until 21 months from formation, so don't expect any insights soon.

All of these 'directors' are apparently paying themselves a salary from Swindon. If the overall budget is "the same" as with Black/Di Canio, yet there is no money for anything, then you wonder how much they are paying themselves.

I hope I am wrong, and I hope all comes good, with backers rather than bloodletters, but until more information is revealed by the new owners it's easy to see why so many people are sceptical. Very sceptical.

The new owners' communication is very poor, but that's probably because they don't want to tell us.

I would like to see the Football League be more open with supporters - perhaps through each club's Trust - as to what the due diligence process revealed when a takeover happens, what the strategy is that they approved, as well as why embargoes are put in place. Because otherwise as fans we are helpless to watch on, unsure whether our club is being milked dry, or managed by people with good intentions but no experience.

It's OK the Football League wanting to bring in more financial fair play regulation, but I think they also have a moral obligation to football fans generally to share with us what is happening.

The Warlock wrote:
SHOULD OF GOT A RUSSIAN! YOU SHOULD OF GOT A RUSSIAN! UTCIAD!

the wizard wrote:

ghanimah wrote:
Hall is also a Director of Carvier Limited. Readers on here may want to Google that...it doesn't make for happy reading

Just read this as well,

http://www.thisismon

ey.co.uk/money/exper

ts/article-2166903/T

ONY-HETHERINGTON-Car

bon-credit-cowboys-r

ise-ashes.html


IMO, sounds like very dodgy dealings, if you get shut down by the Government then that speaks for itself, and now he is a director of our club !!!!!

jam1 wrote:
I'm not being funny but Carbon Trading businesses don't have the best reputations. Tend to be slightly cowboyish outfits. Just saying........

madterrier wrote:
Hi Louis,

Essentially it means that the company that owns Swindon Town Football Club only has £1 in it, and they don't have to reveal what the income/expenditure/l

osses etc. are for another eighteen months.

But I'm more worried (as you should be) about you maybe having to cut off your testicles with a spoon!

SSTM99 wrote:
I am an avid reader of the forums on this site but a first time poster. This article has prompted me to register as a contributor as I am concerned by the stories emanating from our club. I have supported the team since I was 8 and have watched Swindon on a regular basis from that point onwards. During this time we have seen a number of irresponsible owners becoming involved in the club for their own obvious gain. Whilst I can't support how Andrew Black exited the club you have to acknowledge that he put a lot of his own money into it and actively supported one of the most exciting and interesting periods I have known. Without this cash we would potentially not have survived and would probably not be in the play off positions in League 1. However, the rush job that has ensued to get new owners in has created the potential for people to access a well established asset and exploit it for their own gain.

I do not believe our current set of investors have got involved for the 'love of football'. They have surely got into it to make a return. What is unclear is whether it is a short term gain of being paid large amounts for their involvement with STFC or a long term one where they benefit through the move away from the County Ground and a new ground. Jed's judgement must be questioned whether he should be running a multi-million pound community asset given the appointment of this particular Director. As other posters have mentioned the Carbon company Gregory Hall is a director of is associated with dubious characters that have had other companies shut down by the High Court (in the public interest) and City Property has just issued a dissolution notice - www.duedil.com list a summary as 'City Project Limited was incorporated on 28 Oct 2008. The company's status is 'Dissolution Notice Issued', with one director. Gregory Hall is City Project Limited's sole shareholder. They have no known group companies. City Project Limited have total assets of £0 plus total liabilities of £164,889. Their book value is £-28,322, and the value of their shareholders' fund is £-28,322'. I really wanted this to work out so we could focus on the players not back room issues but I am really concerned. Apologies for the lengthy post but I hope it is useful.

MITTED wrote:
All very gloomy today but some very sensible and thought provoking posts dispite what whathisnameindorset says.

The sound of silence from the Board is deafening. Did they honestly think that fans would not do their homework on the new board-member? The unanswered questions are piling up.

Anyway, here's to 3 points tonight.
COYR

louiscassius wrote:

MITTED wrote:
All very gloomy today but some very sensible and thought provoking posts dispite what whathisnameindorset says.

The sound of silence from the Board is deafening. Did they honestly think that fans would not do their homework on the new board-member? The unanswered questions are piling up.

Anyway, here's to 3 points tonight.
COYR

My thoughts excactly.

Here's to 3 big ones....

I'm refusing to drink tonight.

I fear we all may need our wits about us towards the end of the week, as this news unfolds.....daily...



I wouldnt be surprised if the FL throw Jed and his merry men out. Banning them from owning a football Club; and all the sorry secrets follow next week.

Then STFC will be at mercy of the FL and i prey we just stay in the Football League itself.......

I'm happy with League 2.....

Remember, what ever comes out by friday.....

We are STFC......

COYR'sssss]

Always !!!

louiscassius wrote:
I see that one of the directors Hooper's partner Cherry Newbery was the personal secretary of Jayten, the guy who put Luton into Administration.....

This just gets better and better......

Its like a heard of people going round striking at will, striping Clubs of their assets, place them into Admin and walking away, 250k for you, 250k for me....right, lets do one......

Someone in the FL must smell a rat somewehere.....

Didnt Jed try and buy Luton?? Didnt the FL tell him to sling his hook.....

Mind you the FL hate us anyway, thats probably why they agreed for Jed to take over, knowing that he would kill us off......

smirg kcab wrote:

louiscassius wrote:
I see that one of the directors Hooper's partner Cherry Newbery was the personal secretary of Jayten, the guy who put Luton into Administration.....

This just gets better and better......

Its like a heard of people going round striking at will, striping Clubs of their assets, place them into Admin and walking away, 250k for you, 250k for me....right, lets do one......

Someone in the FL must smell a rat somewehere.....

Didnt Jed try and buy Luton?? Didnt the FL tell him to sling his hook.....

Mind you the FL hate us anyway, thats probably why they agreed for Jed to take over, knowing that he would kill us off......

Lou Lou
And you said I was the only one to be negative?
That noose could be flexible as I might need it after you.
Onwards and upwards

lacey198 wrote:
*****BREAKING NEWS****

Mute board add Michael Diamandis to the holding company.

:)

Oi Den! wrote:
Slightly different tack... I think Fitton was the unluckiest of our three chairmen under the old regime.

Wray was brilliant in many ways but I think shares a large measure of responsibility for where we are now because of his constant acceding to PDC's requests. Black got fed up with Wray's yes-man approach to PDC and consequently wanted to replace him with a dispassionate hatchet man. Patey lived up to the role perfectly. Fitton, though, was the man who had to start the ball rolling. It's easy to say with hindsight that Malpas was a bad appointment but the only complaints about him at the time were that he was an unknown quantity. It didn't work out, but nobody knew for sure that it wouldn't. And, despite all that, if Wilson had not failed so spectacularly in 09/10 with a very good side, Fitton would have been hailed as a hero, as he was when he joined the club of course. Greer would not have gone to Brighton, who would have been a division lower than us, and we may well have established ourselves as a Championship club.

Fitton: the man who saved us but who did not get the rub of the green.

the wizard wrote:
Den,
So how does that leave Black, he didn't want to leave a car crash, now we are looking at the aftermath of the car crash, its called the scrapyard.

Oi Den! wrote:

the wizard wrote:
Den,
So how does that leave Black, he didn't want to leave a car crash, now we are looking at the aftermath of the car crash, its called the scrapyard.

Wiz, I think Black probably left the club in far healthier state than it had been for decades. It's just unfortunate that nobody of any substance wanted to buy it. If McCrory and co were the pick of the suitors, I shudder to think what the the others must have been like.

the wizard wrote:
No wonder this lot couldn't wait to get Nick Watkins out of the door.

smirg kcab wrote:
God knows the mess we would be in if the currant board wasn't football fans lol.
Onwards and upwards
Just had a tenner on wilma hat trick.
Just hit the onion bag 3 times wilma, not much to ask is it?

MITTED wrote:

the wizard wrote:
No wonder this lot couldn't wait to get Nick Watkins out of the door.

No so sure that was the case. In the chairman's interview on the radio at the last home match, he said Watkins had already submitted his resignation on 15 Jan, which was some time before the new board came along.

I was surprised that nobody picked up on that at the time, especially the local media, as to why?

COYR

SSTM99 wrote:
I am an avid reader of the forums on this site but a first time poster. This article has prompted me to register as a contributor as I am concerned by the stories emanating from our club. I have supported the team since I was 8 and have watched Swindon on a regular basis from that point onwards. During this time we have seen a number of irresponsible owners becoming involved in the club for their own obvious gain. Whilst I can't support how Andrew Black exited the club you have to acknowledge that he put a lot of his own money into it and actively supported one of the most exciting and interesting periods I have known. Without this cash we would potentially not have survived and would probably not be in the play off positions in League 1. However, the rush job that has ensued to get new owners in has created the potential for people to access a well established asset and exploit it for their own gain.

I do not believe our current set of investors have got involved for the 'love of football'. They have surely got into it to make a return. What is unclear is whether it is a short term gain of being paid large amounts for their involvement with STFC or a long term one where they benefit through the move away from the County Ground and a new ground. Jed's judgement must be questioned whether he should be running a multi-million pound community asset given the appointment of this particular Director. As other posters have mentioned the Carbon company Gregory Hall is a director of is associated with dubious characters that have had other companies shut down by the High Court (in the public interest) and City Property has just issued a dissolution notice - www.duedil.com list a summary as 'City Project Limited was incorporated on 28 Oct 2008. The company's status is 'Dissolution Notice Issued', with one director. Gregory Hall is City Project Limited's sole shareholder. They have no known group companies. City Project Limited have total assets of £0 plus total liabilities of £164,889. Their book value is £-28,322, and the value of their shareholders' fund is £-28,322'. I really wanted this to work out so we could focus on the players not back room issues but I am really concerned. Apologies for the lengthy post but I hope it is useful.

ecklington wrote:
After reading up on Hall and his past endeavours, I would not believe a word anymore from Jed or any of the others in the consortium.

Anyone buying their season tickets would be throwing their money away - for sure!

Unfortunately I was rolled over by a career fraudster 11 yrs ago, lost my business and nearly my house which he tried to steal by conning me. Fortunately after 4 1/2 yrs thro courts, managed to win my house back.

Career fraudsters are so slick and plausible that people are taken in by them very easily, myself included.

Having been through all that, I could see this deal was not stacking up from the start, now with this last conman on board, they will suck all the cash out of the club. Do not in any circumstance renew your season tickets, because that's what they are waiting to drain away. Once bitten......

louiscassius wrote:

madterrier wrote:
Strange. According to Dellam Corporate information, Hall holds only one directorship - Seebeck 87.

By contrast, McCrory holds 23 directorships, Hooper five and Murrall four.

Seebeck 87 was formed with just £1 of share capital - the absolute minimum for a limited company, and probably not even enough for all the directors to own even one share each unless the shares are valued at 5 pence each or something.

The company doesn't have to file accounts until September 2014, probably because as it was formed in December 2012 they chose a September year-end date so that by September 2013 that would only have traded for nine months, hence postponing the date by when they have to file annual accounts until 21 months from formation, so don't expect any insights soon.

All of these 'directors' are apparently paying themselves a salary from Swindon. If the overall budget is "the same" as with Black/Di Canio, yet there is no money for anything, then you wonder how much they are paying themselves.

I hope I am wrong, and I hope all comes good, with backers rather than bloodletters, but until more information is revealed by the new owners it's easy to see why so many people are sceptical. Very sceptical.

The new owners' communication is very poor, but that's probably because they don't want to tell us.

I would like to see the Football League be more open with supporters - perhaps through each club's Trust - as to what the due diligence process revealed when a takeover happens, what the strategy is that they approved, as well as why embargoes are put in place. Because otherwise as fans we are helpless to watch on, unsure whether our club is being milked dry, or managed by people with good intentions but no experience.

It's OK the Football League wanting to bring in more financial fair play regulation, but I think they also have a moral obligation to football fans generally to share with us what is happening.

Dont understand the accounts legally thingy, but hey liked the post about the FL openess with the fans....

buckobassettboy wrote:

louiscassius wrote:

madterrier wrote:
Strange. According to Dellam Corporate information, Hall holds only one directorship - Seebeck 87.

By contrast, McCrory holds 23 directorships, Hooper five and Murrall four.

Seebeck 87 was formed with just £1 of share capital - the absolute minimum for a limited company, and probably not even enough for all the directors to own even one share each unless the shares are valued at 5 pence each or something.

The company doesn't have to file accounts until September 2014, probably because as it was formed in December 2012 they chose a September year-end date so that by September 2013 that would only have traded for nine months, hence postponing the date by when they have to file annual accounts until 21 months from formation, so don't expect any insights soon.

All of these 'directors' are apparently paying themselves a salary from Swindon. If the overall budget is "the same" as with Black/Di Canio, yet there is no money for anything, then you wonder how much they are paying themselves.

I hope I am wrong, and I hope all comes good, with backers rather than bloodletters, but until more information is revealed by the new owners it's easy to see why so many people are sceptical. Very sceptical.

The new owners' communication is very poor, but that's probably because they don't want to tell us.

I would like to see the Football League be more open with supporters - perhaps through each club's Trust - as to what the due diligence process revealed when a takeover happens, what the strategy is that they approved, as well as why embargoes are put in place. Because otherwise as fans we are helpless to watch on, unsure whether our club is being milked dry, or managed by people with good intentions but no experience.

It's OK the Football League wanting to bring in more financial fair play regulation, but I think they also have a moral obligation to football fans generally to share with us what is happening.

Dont understand the accounts legally thingy, but hey liked the post about the FL openess with the fans....

Mcrory has 27 directorships?Not wishing to spread malicious gossip or suggest any wrong doing but anyone familiar with the term Long Firming.

bradley red 1 wrote:

buckobassettboy wrote:

louiscassius wrote:

madterrier wrote:
Strange. According to Dellam Corporate information, Hall holds only one directorship - Seebeck 87.

By contrast, McCrory holds 23 directorships, Hooper five and Murrall four.

Seebeck 87 was formed with just £1 of share capital - the absolute minimum for a limited company, and probably not even enough for all the directors to own even one share each unless the shares are valued at 5 pence each or something.

The company doesn't have to file accounts until September 2014, probably because as it was formed in December 2012 they chose a September year-end date so that by September 2013 that would only have traded for nine months, hence postponing the date by when they have to file annual accounts until 21 months from formation, so don't expect any insights soon.

All of these 'directors' are apparently paying themselves a salary from Swindon. If the overall budget is "the same" as with Black/Di Canio, yet there is no money for anything, then you wonder how much they are paying themselves.

I hope I am wrong, and I hope all comes good, with backers rather than bloodletters, but until more information is revealed by the new owners it's easy to see why so many people are sceptical. Very sceptical.

The new owners' communication is very poor, but that's probably because they don't want to tell us.

I would like to see the Football League be more open with supporters - perhaps through each club's Trust - as to what the due diligence process revealed when a takeover happens, what the strategy is that they approved, as well as why embargoes are put in place. Because otherwise as fans we are helpless to watch on, unsure whether our club is being milked dry, or managed by people with good intentions but no experience.

It's OK the Football League wanting to bring in more financial fair play regulation, but I think they also have a moral obligation to football fans generally to share with us what is happening.

Dont understand the accounts legally thingy, but hey liked the post about the FL openess with the fans....

Mcrory has 27 directorships?Not wishing to spread malicious gossip or suggest any wrong doing but anyone familiar with the term Long Firming.

Yes, met many long firmers in the past and understand where you are coming from,which is why i am concerned for the club.

lacey198 wrote:
*****BREAKING NEWS**** Mute board add Michael Diamandis to the holding company. :)

Med Red wrote:
Having read other posters comments about Hall, it would seem he might be considered to be a bit of a dodgy character. So what does that tell you about Jeddy-boy and his cronies, inviting someone like Hall to become a director. Asset stripping chancers out to profit from whatever and whoever they can sell and then scarper, I wonder????

McCrory worries me... BIG-TIME!!

clunge_meister wrote:
I do think some of the comments are getting a bit out of control now.

I've been sceptical of the abilities of the new owners since they were first muted way back but saying that they are fraudsters and con men is a bit OTT.

who am i wrote:
i see jed is getting some stick on twitter.... The silence is deffening.. looks like what i said last week is really going to happen, glad i didnt renew my season ticket even though my son keeps badgering me to renew. I plead with you once more Sam please get to the bottom of whats going on something is not right..

Wiltshireman wrote:
Doom mongers, gloom mongers.

First question to you is ... Have you looked at the clubs accounts for last year. I bet 99.99% have not

If Ritchie had NOT been sold do you honestly think that the club would still be here. I don't think so.

How far will £500,000 go when you have creditors to pay. Not very far so obviously there is nothing left from that sale.

Yes, £1 is the minimum to buy a company and that is what they paid Black to buy the club along with the debts.

How far did that £500,000 go to clearing the quoted £9m debt which the new board agreed to pay. Again, if they had not cleared the debt the club would NOT still be in existence

If there were anything wrong with the current set up the Football League would NOT, I repeat NOT have sanctioned the takeover and we would be doomed to Conference football next season (not a bad idea, Salisbury City home and away :))

For god's sake just go to the Companies House website, pay the fee and look them up then there is no more

Guessing
Assumptions
Doom from other company info

Every bit of info you have will then be from INDEPENDANT Audits

Is that you Lovesey wrote:
All of you know absolutely nothing,asking people not to buy a ST yet is a great idea, rob the club of the income, wow what a great way to avoid administration, this board have had some challenges, mainly things not paid by the old reime and having to get rid of the expense of PDC and his mob, give them a blooming chance to prove themselves, I can't say I am over the moon with whats happened so far, but come on people get a grip, dark times ahead, maybe, but I didn't stop buying a ST under the greek, what about all the years Sir seton bank rolled us, he was a Town fan pumping millions in, we still didn't have a pot to P1ss in, but thats ok because he is a town fan...

madterrier wrote:
I don't know the legal basis upon which the Football League can demand that a £1.2m bond is paid into an account and ring-fenced but it might be a blessing in disguise of sorts. The embargo could be due to this 'unseen event' as Murrall described it, or it could be due to the club not having met the disclosure requirements for the FL to calculate whether it is within the salary cap requirement right now.

Hall has been made a director of the holding company - not the football club. So he won't be drawing a 'salary' as the other four are reported to be, but watch out for Diamandis-style 'consultancy' contracts with the club. Otherwise why has he joined the holding company?

The company he is CEO of - City Project - is regarded as 'High risk' and 'credit not recommended' by credit agencies. Apparently the company has 'taken advantage of exemptions under the Companies act such that accounts have not been audited or examined.'

The other strange thing is the timing. As the embargo is still in place, and supporters are concerned or angry, why would Jed and co. make this appointment now, rather than wait, if all it was going to do is alert people?

Maybe The Adver should contact our 'friends' at The Football League Paper, Chris Dunlavy and David Emery. While they got it wrong in accusing Swindon of cheating our way to the League 2 title, they do crusade against overspending and dodgy owners in football, and will have a more overall perspective. They may be interested in the latest developments here at Swindon, if we could stomach their conclusions.

Wiltshireman wrote:
Doom mongers, gloom mongers.

First question to you is ... Have you looked at the clubs accounts for last year. I bet 99.99% have not

If Ritchie had NOT been sold do you honestly think that the club would still be here. I don't think so.

How far will £500,000 go when you have creditors to pay. Not very far so obviously there is nothing left from that sale.

Yes, £1 is the minimum to buy a company and that is what they paid Black to buy the club along with the debts.

How far did that £500,000 go to clearing the quoted £9m debt which the new board agreed to pay. Again, if they had not cleared the debt the club would NOT still be in existence

If there were anything wrong with the current set up the Football League would NOT, I repeat NOT have sanctioned the takeover and we would be doomed to Conference football next season (not a bad idea, Salisbury City home and away :))

For god's sake just go to the Companies House website, pay the fee and look them up then there is no more

Guessing
Assumptions
Doom from other company info

Every bit of info you have will then be from INDEPENDANT Audits

BillyLucas4me wrote:
The Warlock says...
11:36am Tue 19 Mar 13

SHOULD OF GOT A RUSSIAN! YOU SHOULD OF GOT A RUSSIAN! UTCIAD!”

We should HAVE got a Russian perhaps We should HAVE got a Russian perhaps
We should HAVE got a Russian perhaps

Are you a PURTON Warlock?

The Warlock wrote:

BillyLucas4me wrote:
The Warlock says...
11:36am Tue 19 Mar 13

SHOULD OF GOT A RUSSIAN! YOU SHOULD OF GOT A RUSSIAN! UTCIAD!”

We should HAVE got a Russian perhaps We should HAVE got a Russian perhaps
We should HAVE got a Russian perhaps

Are you a PURTON Warlock?

No, i'm not. Purton is a small village laying in the outskirts of Scummersvile (Swindon). I'm from SUNNY SUNNY BOURNEMOUTH! Aren't your tinpot team playing tonight?

SAPFanSTFC wrote:

The Warlock wrote:

BillyLucas4me wrote:
The Warlock says...
11:36am Tue 19 Mar 13

SHOULD OF GOT A RUSSIAN! YOU SHOULD OF GOT A RUSSIAN! UTCIAD!”

We should HAVE got a Russian perhaps We should HAVE got a Russian perhaps
We should HAVE got a Russian perhaps

Are you a PURTON Warlock?

No, i'm not. Purton is a small village laying in the outskirts of Scummersvile (Swindon). I'm from SUNNY SUNNY BOURNEMOUTH! Aren't your tinpot team playing tonight?

No he's not - same person as ever under a different ID but from the scummers down the road.
.
Notice how a certain previous poster was always on our site after a draw or loss but was goading even when Bournemouth lost....yet the Pox hadn't lost.....scan forward to the other day when Pox lost, Bournemouth went above us yet......NOTHING!!..

.you can smell it in his posts and it is a scummy Poxford smell not a sea breeze.