Heavy downpours put end to more water restrictions

Thames Water confirmed today there is no longer a possibility of more serious water restrictions being needed for its customers this year but expressed continuing caution about longer-term prospects.

Following exceptionally heavy rain in April and the first few days of May, the company said that although its temporary use ban, or ‘hosepipe ban’, would need to remain in place for the time being, it could now rule out applying for a Drought Order, which is required for a supplier to impose further restrictions.

Today’s announcement by Thames Water comes after the Environment Agency published a report removing drought status for 19 counties in England but confirming that London and the South East are still in drought, and that despite recent rain groundwater levels remain lower than 1976 in some areas.

Richard Aylard, Thames Water’s sustainability director, said: “It is a great relief for us that we can now rule out seeking a Drought Order this year.

“No water company wants to impose restrictions on its customers for any longer than absolutely necessary. Despite all the recent rain, we still have a serious groundwater shortage, and we could yet have a long hot summer, so, much as we’d love to, it would be irresponsible for us to lift the ‘hosepipe ban’ just yet.”

Some boreholes in the Thames region are still at exceptionally low levels and it will be a couple of weeks before it is known just how much of the recent rain has found its way deep underground to top them up.

Thames Water, which supplies 8.8m people across London and the Thames Valley, will continue to monitor the situation very carefully, while continuing to plan for the possibility of a third dry winter in succession.

It plans to update its customers early in June.

In the meantime the company is reviewing how the Temporary Use Ban is operating, and looking at ways to minimise impacts on the people whose livelihoods depend on using water in their businesses.

Following the second-wettest April on record in the Thames region (262% of long-term average rainfall), the situation on the surface of the ground, including increased flows in rivers, has improved. However, the natural underground stores of water, known as groundwater, which feed the flows in rivers throughout the year, remain exceptionally low.

“Although the current account, in our reservoirs and rivers, is in good shape at the moment, the savings account, deep below ground, is still in the red,” said Mr Aylard.

“As the latest Environment Agency data shows, following the two driest years ever in our region, the exceptionally heavy rain in April and early May has not made a significant impact deep below ground, at least not yet.

“Groundwater levels in many areas remain at their lowest ever, lower even than in 1976. So while it’s wet on top, it remains dry underneath. That means we have to be cautious about the possibility of a dry summer and particularly of a third dry winter in succession, which would create more severe problems for next year.

“In normal years, with good winter rainfall that seeps into the ground, the groundwater provides the ‘base flow’ in our rivers throughout the rest of the year. If we have another dry period we currently do not have that safety net. Until the groundwater recovers, our water resources will remain finely balanced, which is why our Temporary Use Ban must remain in place and why it's more important than ever that we all continue to use this precious resource wisely.”

Comments(13)

PaulD says...
12:30pm Fri 11 May 12

Thames Water take the p*** in more ways than one

The Real Librarian says...
12:30pm Fri 11 May 12

This story is not appearing correctly on my PC.
.
There is nothing here about Thames making any effort to reduce the trillions of litres of water lost every year through pipe leakage.

towny_gurl says...
12:37pm Fri 11 May 12

I watched the BBC1 West programme about the dought and the TW spokesman said that they wanted compensation for putting in a pipe to ease the extraction on the Axford bore - easy solution take it out of their vast profits

The Artist formally known as Grumpy Old Man says...
12:42pm Fri 11 May 12

It's also missing the bit of the story that mentions how they're investing in new infrastructure such as expanding reservoirs and de-salinisation plants etc to mitigate against this happening again, how they will oppose further over development of the south and east and how they will be withholding directors bonuses and shareholder dividends until they provide an acceptable service.

oldbutawake says...
3:10pm Fri 11 May 12

Why would a German company make vast investments in Britain? Utility companies should NEVER be allowed to be sold to overseas buyers.

Perhaps if the water comapnies hadn't been sold off we might even talk about a national water grid to pump the surplus from other areas to those who need it! Fat chance now!

oldbutawake says...
3:14pm Fri 11 May 12

Oops!

Apparently the Germans sold it to the Australians 4 years ago. Sorry for the error, but the sentiments the same!!

PaulD says...
3:20pm Fri 11 May 12

agreed. National infrastructure ownership should always remain in Britain. Hell, it should all be renationalised and maybe just tendered to the private sector to run it for 10 years at a time under strict rules

Hmmmf says...
10:01pm Fri 11 May 12

Richard Aylard, Thames Water’s sustainability director, did not say: "We're sorry we're losing 675 million litres a day in leaks, and we will be investing all our obscene profits into improving our infrastructure until such time as our leakage rate ceases to be the grotesque 'elephant in the room' we and the media all desperately try to ignore."

itsamess says...
12:52am Sat 12 May 12

Mother nature creates problems beyond the control of us humans.

PJC says...
11:35am Sat 12 May 12

It would probably be cheaper to filter & purify the rainwater from your garden water butt, & cut them out of the equation altogether. That'd learn 'em!

candid friend says...
2:46pm Sat 12 May 12

Prior to the Tory sell off of water to their business friends, Swindon had a fine Water Dept serving the surrounding area.
Low charges, good service, sensible salaries, no bonuses.
Inclusion in Thames Water meant that the Swindon and area residents started paying for mains renewals in London, Fancy salaries, Dividends, and Bonuses to the fat cat directors.

Always Grumpy says...
7:57pm Sat 12 May 12

candid friend wrote:
Prior to the Tory sell off of water to their business friends, Swindon had a fine Water Dept serving the surrounding area.
Low charges, good service, sensible salaries, no bonuses.
Inclusion in Thames Water meant that the Swindon and area residents started paying for mains renewals in London, Fancy salaries, Dividends, and Bonuses to the fat cat directors.
Not forgetting some of the finest quality water in the country.

Phorever says...
1:45am Tue 15 May 12

There was a reservoir in Box that was leaking into the abandoned mines for at least 5 years. At a fair old rate as well. It has only just been fixed.

Search youtube for _MmYLyZev98

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree