News RSS Feed


Your opinion counts so tell us what you think about our stories. Add your comment below each story or e-mail the editor by clicking here.

Builders vie for green field site

3:50pm Thursday 23rd October 2008

comment Comments (5)   Have your say »


Housing giant Barratt, which is keen to build 3,600 homes on the flood plain close to Chippenham town centre, is just one developer who has vied for the site over the last twenty years.

The company has submitted a proposal to North Wiltshire District Council to ask whether they need to undertake an environmental impact assessment before putting in a planning application for the massive development.

District and county councillor for Chippenham Patrick Coleman remembers a similar proposal submitted 15 years ago.

He said: “At that time the county council asked us to consider agreeing to a housing developer paying to have an option over the land.

“This would have meant that they could have built on the land when they wanted to.

“We were all against this proposal as we were all, and still are, of the opinion that greenfield sites should be the last to be developed.

“I am now concerned more than ever that land, such as that to the rear of Hardens Mead, should be left as it is.

“I am also of the opinion that developers think they have a window of opportunity to slide plans under the radar between March next year when the district council disbands to June when the unitary authority takes over.

“During this time the Regional Spatial Strategy, which says more and more houses should be build, overrules the local plan, which manages where and how many dwellings can be built.”

Coun Coleman also said there were a number of other potential areas for development that would not have such a detrimental affect on the town.

He said: “Although controversial, I think building houses on the ambulance station on Malmesbury Road and Langley Park Industrial Estate where ASDA wants to move is much more suitable.”

The land, which covers more than 200ha is predominately owned by Wiltshire County Council with a small plot of land to the north east of the site belonging to a farmer.

FACT FILE

  • The proposal is to see whether or not Barratt would need to undertake an Environmental Impact Assessment for the land before submitting a planning application.
  • The plan itself is to develop the 209ha site for 3,600 houses and set aside 22ha for employment land, a local centre, shops, community centres, health facilities, a pub, a post office and a number of educational facilities.

It also includes areas for landscaping and public open space.

  • The majority of the land is owned by Wiltshire County Council with a small patch to the North East owned by a farmer. The site wraps around the River Avon and starts just behind Hardens Mead to the south all the way up to Monkton Park on the north and Stanley Lane to the east.
  • The last application for the site was submitted in 1993 when Wiltshire County Council asked councillors in Chippenham to consider selling an option to a developer to build on the site at a later date. This was rejected.

Your Say YourThe Wiltshire Gazette and Herald

Figural, Studley says...
4:40pm Thu 23 Oct 08

This is a thoroughly bad idea. It's well-known now that large developments reduce the capacity of land to absorb rainfall, and channel run-off into drains and rivers instead, increasing the risk of flooding. If this development goes ahead, I wonder whether house-owners there will even be able to insure their houses against flood damage. The Environment Agency should have a veto on development in an area that's already at risk of flooding, or would raise the risk of flooding. We just can't build on flood plains any longer, and expect flooding not to occur. I think it was Einstein who defined insanity as repeating the same old actions and expecting the results to be different.

chipper, Chippenham says...
8:22am Fri 24 Oct 08

It's beyond belief that after the flooding problems that have been experienced around the country over the last couple of years, that it would even be considered to build houses on a flood plain. Is there really anybody stupid enough to buy houses there? There must be plenty of relatively dry areas around Chippenham that could be built on - oh but I forgot those areas wouldn't be so cheap to buy would they?

chipsticks, Chippenham says...
2:53pm Fri 24 Oct 08

Utterly ridiculas to even consider these plans. The town is currently collapsing under the weight at present. Another 3600 houses will destroy the town. Lets hope that some sense will prevail somewhere in the council!

The Maxter, Chippenham says...
3:41pm Fri 24 Oct 08

Bonkers.

Butwick, Calne says...
1:00pm Sun 26 Oct 08

This is ludicrous! My parents have lived on Monkton Park for the past 35 years. During this time they have known the area to flood severly at least 10 times. Not only that but they currently have the most stunning views over the fields and can even see across to Cherhill. They didn't want to move from their home but who wants to look out on 3,600 homes. Chippenham has grown so much but it does not have the infrastructure to support such a massive development. My mum says that pipes have already started being laid down, are they already testing the site? As a child I have fond memories of growing up in this area, this is a natural area of country side that should be enjoyed. What will happen to the beutiful cycle track and where will children and dog walkers now go if there are no green fields left? Surely there are protected species living among this lovely countryside? Personally I think Pewsham is an eyesore as it has grown and grown, and yet these plans would be to develop a site far larger than pewsham is currently. Where in Chippenham will you have green fields remaining if they are to build here - where will it stop, will Chippenham soon join with Calne and every village in between getting eaten up by the developers! The only green spaces left in Chippenham will be the parks - I thought we were supposed to live in a RURAL area! In the current econmic climate estate agents reckon they are selling on average 1 home per week, who on earth is going to purchase so many houses that they won't be able to insure sitting on a flood plain? Come on, leave it well alone, have some common sense Council and developers and stop being so greedy!!!

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »