News RSS Feed


Your opinion counts so tell us what you think about our stories. Add your comment below each story or e-mail the editor by clicking here.

Gypsies claim racial bigotry

10:56am Thursday 10th July 2008

comment Comments (2)   Have your say »


GYPSIES who are fighting to keep their community at Minety have been treated with hypocrisy by council bosses, an inquiry heard this week.

The second public inquiry into the unauthorised building work at the site in Sambourne Road, heard by planning inspector Karen Ridge, got under way at North Wiltshire District Council on Tuesday.

Gypsy families were among those attending the inquiry, with Minety residents who have fought the development.

Representing the gypsies, Alan Masters said his clients want the same treatment as Minety residents. He said: "The Minety travellers have been victims of hypocrisy.

"The village of Minety is deemed as an area suitable for development by the council but the nearby appeal site is not.

"The gypsies have settled in the area and their children attend local schools. The council's approach is a failure to follow the Race Relations Act."

Earlier Mrs Ridges called for respect and outlined the main point of the investigation. She said: "This is a planning inquiry not a public meeting. I'm aware the subject is emotive but please do not interrupt or shout out. Please be respectful. This inquiry is here to determine the effect of the development on the local area given the nature of its affects on neighbouring parties."

Saira Kabir Sheikh, representing North Wiltshire District Council, said: "The appeal scheme does not represent a sustainable form of development. The development is significant in size and is unduly intrusive in the countryside.

"The scheme causes significant harm and has a detrimental impact on the character and amenities of the countryside. The scheme is also harmful to adjoining residential property."

Most of the opening morning was taken up with the cross examination of planning expert Simon Chambers, the council's sole witness.

He said: "As stated I believe there has been no physical change in the circumstances since the previous appeal was assessed and there has been substantial progress towards the assessment of gypsy and traveller accommodation needs and potential delivery of sufficient land to accommodate that need.

"There are a number of factors contributing to the unsustainability of the appeal site compared to the village.

"One of the reasons is village residents have better access to transport links whereas the appeal site is isolated making access to public transport much more difficult."


Your Say YourThe Wiltshire Gazette and Herald

jax, wiltshire says...
1:54pm Thu 10 Jul 08

I understand that there is a public site at Thingley. If the Gypsies at Minety had gone onto the waiting list 3yrs ago they would have by now been re-sited there however I think the issue is that this group do not want to live on a public site even if one was found but a site of their own. The site at Minety is out of the village framework for development and is not fit within criteria listed by the Government for Gypsy sites. The public are asking for equality on the basis that the current site would not be allowed to be developed by anyone else so why are the rules different for Gypsies. This was the point the MP was making. Thus it seems that Gypsies are being given preference over the existing residents to the detriment of the settled community.

GypsieJoe, glasgow says...
11:32am Sun 27 Jul 08

Gerroff moi laand!!!

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »